Εγκυκλοπαίδεια Μείζονος Ελληνισμού, Μ. Ασία ΙΔΡΥΜΑ ΜΕΙΖΟΝΟΣ ΕΛΛΗΝΙΣΜΟΥ
z
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Αναζήτηση με το γράμμα ΑΑναζήτηση με το γράμμα ΒΑναζήτηση με το γράμμα ΓΑναζήτηση με το γράμμα ΔΑναζήτηση με το γράμμα ΕΑναζήτηση με το γράμμα ΖΑναζήτηση με το γράμμα ΗΑναζήτηση με το γράμμα ΘΑναζήτηση με το γράμμα ΙΑναζήτηση με το γράμμα ΚΑναζήτηση με το γράμμα ΛΑναζήτηση με το γράμμα ΜΑναζήτηση με το γράμμα ΝΑναζήτηση με το γράμμα ΞΑναζήτηση με το γράμμα ΟΑναζήτηση με το γράμμα ΠΑναζήτηση με το γράμμα ΡΑναζήτηση με το γράμμα ΣΑναζήτηση με το γράμμα ΤΑναζήτηση με το γράμμα ΥΑναζήτηση με το γράμμα ΦΑναζήτηση με το γράμμα ΧΑναζήτηση με το γράμμα ΨΑναζήτηση με το γράμμα Ω

Gagai

Συγγραφή : Kamara Afroditi (11/2/2000)
Μετάφραση : Kamara Afroditi

Για παραπομπή: Kamara Afroditi, "Gagai",
Εγκυκλοπαίδεια Μείζονος Ελληνισμού, Μ. Ασία
URL: <http://www.ehw.gr/l.aspx?id=12274>

Γάγαι (30/7/2008 v.1) Gagai (31/3/2009 v.1) 
 

1. Sources and History

The ancient Lycian city of Gagai was located on the eastern extremity of the gulf of Finike, to the east of Myra. The location is today identified as Aktaş, very close to the village of Yenice and almost 11 km northeast of Kumluca.1 The city was situated near the cost and it was built on a hill about 600 m high. The earliest mention of the city in antiquity comes from Pseudo-Skylax, in the 4th century B.C., who refers to it as “Gagaia”. It is also mentioned by Pliny,2 who places it between Korydalla and Rhodiapolis. Later mentions are those in the Stadiasmus,3 the one by Stephanus Byzantius and that of Hierocles.4

The etymology of the name is related to two fables.5 According to the former, Rhodian settlers reached the coast and shouted to the natives “Ga, Ga”, asking for land in the Dorian dialect, which the natives did accord to them. According to the second version, the Rhodian general Nemios was trapped with his ship in a tempest, after having defeated Lycian and Cilician pirates. The sailors cried terrified “Ga, Ga”, and when they finally reached the land, Nemios decided to found a city at that spot. The common ground between the two fables is that they attribute the foundation of the city to the Rhodians. Ancient sources, however, speak also of a mineral, namely “gagates”,6 which, according to descriptions, was similar to brown coal (lignite). Travelers during the 19th century,7 however, do not mention such a mineral, whereas even today the only visible stone is white limestone, as attested also by the Turkish name Aktaş (Ak taş=white stone). It is possible that the bad quality of the local stone was responsible for the frequent use of rubble masonry as well as for the absence both of Lycian tombs (the construction of which demands a high quality sculpture) and of inscriptions.8

2. Archaeology

Nowadays the archaeological remains are located on the hill and are discerned in two zones. The upper level comprises a defense wall made of rubble masonry. On the northern side of the wall there is a gate about 1.5 m wide. On the summit of the hill there is a fort about 16 m long and 8 m wide. It is built with ashlar masonry. Another building, to the northeast of the fort, built with the same method, constitutes a puzzle for archaeologists, as it comprises a cavity with three or four rows of seats, like a synthronon of an early Christian basilica. The lower level of fortifications is situated almost halfway downhill and is probably of a later date. It protects the settlement only from the sea, whereas on the other side it ends at a sheer rock, further fortified with a wall wherever needed.

According to Spratt,9 remains of buildings were scattered on the coastal plain at the bottom of the hill, dated to the Roman and Byzantine periods. They comprised parts of fortification walls and of an aqueduct, as well as of basilicas. These remains are not visible today. The only thing that still survives is the location of a small theatre, which, according to the testimonies of the inhabitants, was in good condition until 1960, which means that its architectural members were used by them as building material.

3. Religion

The lack of epigraphic material does not enlighten us on the gods worshipped at Gagai. The god Apollo10 is depicted on coins of the imperial period, which probably means that he was the patron god of the city.11 On other coins, dated to the reign of Gordian III, Nemesisis is depicted, but we can assume that this was due to an influence by Rhodiapolis at the time of the financial benefactions of Opramoas.12

During the Early Byzantine period the city was the seat of a bishop and, according to Eusebius, it was comprised among the noteworthy cities of Lycia. However, we do not have enough evidence for the history of the city in the early Byzantine period.

1. Bean, G., Lycian Turkey: An archaeological Guide (London 1978), p. 148 mentions Yenice as the closest village, at a distance of only1.5 klms from the remains. Apparently Aktaş is a more recent Turkish name of the same village.

2. Plin., NH 5.28.100.

3. Anonymi Stadiasmus maris magni 235.

4. Hierocl. Synekd. 683.3.

5. Etym.Magn. 219, s.v. “Gagai”.

6. It is attested mainly in medical texts for its healing properties. See Galen, Medic. 75.12.203-4, Pseudo-Galen 29.14.402.6, 482.1, 19.725.15. Orphic 12.17.1. Dioscorides Pedanios 4.61.2 et al.

7. Spratt, T.A.B. – Forbes, E., Travels in Lycia, Milyas and the Cibyratis I/II (London 1847) and Fellows, C., Travels and researches in Asia Minor more particularly in the province of Lycia (London 1852, repr. Darmstadt 1975), p. 366-367.

8. This was at least Fellows’ view, who placed however wrongly Gagai near the village Hacıveliler.

9. Spratt, T.A.B. – Forbes, E., Travels in Lycia, Milyas and the Cibyratis I/II (London 1847).

10. Troxell, H.A., The coinage of the Lycian League (Copenhagen 1982), pl. 6, no. 39.1.

11. Frei, P., “Die Götterkülte Lykiens in der Kaisereit“, ANRW II 18.3 (Bonn-New York 1990), p. 1764.

12. Frei, P., “Die Götterkülte Lykiens in der Kaisereit“, ANRW II 18.3 (Bonn-New York 1990), p. 1815.

     
 
 
 
 
 

Δελτίο λήμματος

 
press image to open photo library
 

>>>