1. Historical Framework
The Nestongos family migrated to the province of Bithynia along with other eminent Byzantine families after Constantinople was captured by the forces of the fourth Crusade in April 1204. They gradually managed to hold senior posts in the administration of the Byzantine Empire of Nicaea.1
2. The Rebellion
The brothers Andronikos and Isaac Nestongos, first cousins of the second emperor of Nicaea, John III Doukas Vatatzes, attempted to overthrow him around 1225, while he was away from the capital Nicaea trying to confront the simultaneous attacks of the Latin Empire of Constantinople against Thrace, northwestern Asia Minor and the Aegean. It has been suggested that during the rebellion of the Nestongos Family the latter were morally supported by the brothers Alexios and Isaac Laskaris, who held the title of and a little earlier (1224-1225) had been the prime movers of a rebellion against John III in collaboration with the Latin emperor Robert de Courtenay (1221-1228). It seems that the information provided by the sources is not explicit and, therefore, any connection would be ungrounded. The Laskaris brothers, already punished by blinding because of their betrayal of the emperor, were possibly unable to provide sufficient, even moral, support. However, their involvement, yet in their absence, in the ideological consolidation of the Nestongos rebellion should not be excluded. The main inciters of the rebellion, according to the sources, were the Flamoulis (or Flamoulios), a member of the Tarchaneiotes family, a member of the Synadenos family and Makrenos, the of the theme of Thrakesion.
When the rebellion broke out in Nicaea, the imperial troops were in Lampsakos and, therefore, John III was informed late about the event. However, when he became aware of what was happening, he acted swiftly and effectively. At first, he ordered that the ships at the harbour of Lampsakos be set to fire so that they would not be captured by the Latins, who could use them against Nicaea. As John III’s next priority was to effectively deal with the internal political danger of the Nestongos rebellion, which was threatening the imperial power of Nicaea, he ordered the immediate departure of his army from Lampsakos and marched to Achyraous. On arriving there, he formed an informal council aiming to rally everybody around him and fully deal with the matter. It is possible that the supporters of the Nestongos rebellion did not manage to attract a considerable number of supporters and, as a result, their venture did not receive any substantial military help and when the forces of the Empire of Nicaea under John III turned against the rebels and arrested them there was no serious resistance. According to the sources (mainly George Akropolites and Theodore Skoutariotes), there was no battle given before the rebels were arrested. Therefore, it may be inferred that either the rebels never fought against the imperial forces or the alleged clash is not worth mentioning. After all, the military suppression of the rebellion of the Nestongos brothers must have been an easy target for John III.2
Aftertherebellionwassuppressedtheparticipantswerearrestedandtriedaccordingtothe norms. All the accused were found guilty of high treason, an offence attracting the death penalty. But Emperor John III was mercifulto them and ordered that the rebels be punished with minor penalties. As a result, Isaac Nestongos was sentenced to blinding and mutilation of his one hand, as it happened with Makrenos, who was accused of having attempted to maliciously harm the emperor. The rest of the rebels were punished with evenmilderpenaltiesand were imprisoned for a short period.
Although he was the primemoveroftherebellion, accordingtoallsources, Andronikos Nestongos was treated particularly and rather inexplicably mildly by the emperor. Andronikos was only imprisoned at the castle of Magnesia, to the northeast of Smyrna. However, itseemsthathe was not strictly guarded there. Within a little time the imprisoned rebel escaped and sought shelter in the Seljuk Sultanate of Rûm, where he remained until his death. As for this escape, it is clearly reported that it was made with the tacit consent of the emperor of Nicaea, who had a great liking for Andronikos.3 Contemporary bibliography also refers to this liking, suggesting a psychological reason for the extremely lenient attitude of John III towards the instigator of a rebellion that had put the imperial power in danger.
The unsuccessful rebellion of the Nestongos brothers in 1225 did not have any direct impact on the political, social and economic life of the Empire of Nicaea. However, in the following period thesafety measures for the protection of the emperor became stronger, as he seemed to be in obvious danger. The policy adopted by John III duringthenextyearsgavetheempirean unchallenged supremacy over its rivals. The victories mainlyagainst theforcesoftheLatinEmpireofConstantinopleandtheSeljukSultanateofRûm as well as the diplomatic successes against Bulgaria and the state of Epirussparked a wave of euphoria across the empire. The rebellion of the Nestongos brothers was the last defiance to John III’s authority until his death in 1254.
1. E. Trapp - A. Kazhdan, entry “Nestongos”, The Oxford History of Byzantium 2, p. 1459.
2. Σαββίδης Α., Βυζαντινά στασιαστικά και αυτονομιστικά κινήματα... (Athens 1987), pp. 232-45.
3. Heisenberg, Α. (corr. P. Wirth) (ed.), Georgii Acropolitae Opera I (Stuttgart 1978), p. 23.